Tuesday, September 28, 2021

The Wife of Bath’s Tale (from The Canterbury Tales)

 About The Canterbury Tales:

The Canterbury Tales (Middle English: Tales of Caunterbury) is a collection of 24 stories that runs to over 17,000 lines written in Middle English by Geoffrey Chaucer between 1387 and 1400. In 1386, Chaucer became Controller of Customs and Justice of the Peace and, in 1389, Clerk of the King's Works. It was during these years that Chaucer began working on his most famous text, The Canterbury Tales. The tales (mostly written in verse, although some are in prose) are presented as part of a story-telling contest by a group of pilgrims as they travel together from London to Canterbury to visit the shrine of Saint Thomas Becket at Canterbury Cathedral. The prize for this contest is a free meal at the Tabard Inn at Southwark on their return.

The Wife of Bath’s Tale:

In a land populated by fairies and elves, in the days of King Arthur, a young knight rapes a maiden he sees walking from the river one day. For his offense, Queen Guinevere and her ladies rule that his punishment is to find out within one year what women most desire, or else he'll be beheaded. The knight departs on his quest to find the answer to this question, but despite questioning women all over the land and receiving numerous answers, he cannot find two women who agree on what women most desire.

After a year, the knight returns to King Arthur's court with a heavy heart, no closer to knowing what women most desire. On the way, he comes across a ring of 24 fairy ladies dancing. The fairies quickly disappear, only to be replaced by an ugly old hag. Upon learning of his quest, the hag agrees to tell the knight what women most desire if he promises to grant her anything she desires. The knight agrees. The hag tells the knight what women most desire – to have sovereignty over their husbands and lovers. The queen and all the ladies assemble agree that he is correct. As the court is adjourning, the hag petitions the queen to force the knight to fulfill his promise to her: she wants the knight to marry her. Despite the knight's reluctance, the queen insists that he must do so, and the knight and hag are married.

On their wedding knight, the knight doesn't want to consummate the marriage. The hag asks what ails him, and he tells her that she is so ugly, old, and low-class that it's no wonder he does not desire her. This prompts a long speech from the hag on the true origins of gentility, and the advantages of poverty and old age. The hag concludes her speech by offering the knight a choice: either he can have her old and ugly, but a good and faithful wife, or he can have her young and beautiful, but with no guarantee of these other good qualities. The knight turns the decision over to his wife, asking her to make the choice. Once the hag has confirmed that her husband has yielded sovereignty to her, she tells him that she will be both: young and beautiful, and a faithful, good wife to him. The knight takes his young, beautiful wife in his arms and they live happily ever after. The wife is not only faithful and good, but also obedient to her husband for the rest of their lives together.

The Wife concludes her story by praying Jesus to send women “husbands who are young and fresh on bed and also to show grace to them.” She also calls down a curse on husbands who refuse to be ruled by their wives.

Themes:

Women and Femininity:

The knight's punishment for rape is a quest in which he must discover what women most desire. This plot element is an occasion for the tale to expound upon all of the various things women desire and, in some cases, what these desires reveal about their nature. Although "The Wife of Bath's Tale" begins with the sexual assault of a woman, the rest of it imagines a world in which women are sovereign and in which they mete out judgments, administer justice, and have power over men's bodies. This world is the one that women want, at least according to the loathly lady's assertion that what women most desire is sovereignty over their husbands and lovers. Yet curiously, at the end of the tale, the loathly-lady-turned-beautiful-wife yields power back to her husband despite his willingness to grant it to her, raising questions about what it is women really desire. This ending is in keeping with the wide variety of things people tell the knight women most desire, for, at the end of the tale, women turn out to be just as big of a question mark as they were in at its beginning.

Power:

A knight deprives a maiden of power over her own body; his punishment, as decided by the women of the court, is that he must find out what women most desire, which turns out to be power. "The Wife of Bath's Tale" makes a point of how the knight's punishment fits his crime inasmuch as he must yield power over his body, first to the queen and her court, and finally to the hag he must marry. And indeed, after the disturbing opening, power in "The Wife of Bath's Tale" rests solely in the hands of women, who mete out punishment, administer justice, and force the knight to fulfill his promise to the hag. At the end of the tale, however, the locus of power seems to have shifted when the knight's wife gives mastery back to her husband. Even the Wife of Bath's concluding prayer requesting easy-to-dominate husbands can't quite contain our feeling that, by the end of the tale, power has again reverted to the hands of men, the place where it was abused at the tale's beginning.

Rules and Order:

At the beginning of "The Wife of Bath's Tale," a knight commits rape, and the rest of the tale is concerned with how the law punishes him for his misdeed (or not). The queen immediately asks for the privilege of judgment over the knight, but rejects the traditional punishment of beheading in favor of justice that's more rehabilitative than punitive. "The Wife of Bath's Tale" emphasizes the way in which the law demands sovereignty over people's bodies in the way you forfeit the right to determine the fate of yours when you break it. It also emphasizes the way making a vow has the same effect in one's voluntary yielding of sovereignty to another. The law and vow-making thus join women as things that demand cession of a man's sovereignty; since the 'thing that women most desire' is also a kind of rule for men, this consonance makes sense.

Principles:

The big principle at issue in "The Wife of Bath's Tale" is gentility. Gentility was thought to be a quality of a person that caused him to do noble deeds, keep his promises, and generally behave virtuously. The knight's accusation that the loathly lady is 'lowborn,' implying that she lacks gentility, prompts a response from the lady in which she unearths the true origins of "gentilesse." The question at hand is whether this gentilesse is a quality that naturally inheres in the offspring of a certain class, or whether it results from one's actions. The lady believes the latter, and uses logical, educated arguments to convince the knight of it, too. The upshot of her discussion is that, at the end of it, she's able to reasonably claim that she is gentle and the knight is not. Score one for the loathly lady.

Appearances:

Since the plot of "The Wife of Bath's Tale" has at its heart a loathly lady who shape-shifts into a beautiful, young damsel, we might expect appearances to be important here. And they are, just not for the reason you might think. For instead of this being a tale about how a knight learns to appreciate people for what's on the inside and that outer appearances don't matter, it's a tale about how a knight learns to give up sovereignty to his wife. That sovereignty includes power over the body. The loathly lady's physical appearance becomes an important symbol of that body, so that, at the end of the tale, when she offers her husband a choice about how he wants her to look, she's in essence offering him control of her body. He grants this control back to her, thus proving his understanding of the doctrine of women's sovereignty in marriage. Medieval stories don't necessarily go in for the whole 'appearances don't mean anything' maxim anyway, as we've seen in the  “General Prologue”.

Old Age:

The loathly lady's old age is what makes her wise, a fact she establishes definitively when she reminds the knight that the old age gives wisdom to her. The connection of age with the wisdom of lived experience is the main idea that we get from the tale of the Wife of Bath. What we're not familiar with from that Prologue is the linking of age to "foulness," sexual sterility, or undesirability that occurs in "The Wife of Bath's Tale." What we need to keep in mind, however, is that much of the equation of age with ugliness is made by the knight. The fact is that, in the end, the loathly (old) lady is the one who saves the knight's neck and reforms him  and this suggests that old age makes one wise and useful. It does not, however, make one a suitable marriage partner for a young bachelor, which is why at tale's end, the old lady becomes a young damsel.

Poverty:

When her husband attacks her suitableness as a wife because she is poor, the loathly lady launches into a long speech in "The Wife of Bath's Tale" that includes a meditation on the virtues of poverty. Coming right after her longer consideration of the origins of gentility, the lady's poverty speech sometimes repeats the same technique, attempting to convince the knight that, just as those who aren't gentlemen are still "gentil," those who are poor can still be rich. To do this she points to various things poor men have that rich men lack, including freedom from fear of robbery and  a general sense of contentment. These 'possessions,' the lady is saying, actually make the poor man rich. The lady also points to various virtues of poverty-as-poverty, including a knowledge of God, self, and who one's friends and enemies are. The lady's discussion of poverty has nothing to do with the material day-to-day lives of the poor; instead it explores the concept of poverty in an abstract way that draws upon a tradition of writings about poverty by authors like Seneca and Boethius.

The Knight’s Tale (from The Canterbury Tales)

 About The Canterbury Tales:

The Canterbury Tales (Middle English: Tales of Caunterbury) is a collection of 24 stories that runs to over 17,000 lines written in Middle English by Geoffrey Chaucer between 1387 and 1400. In 1386, Chaucer became Controller of Customs and Justice of the Peace and, in 1389, Clerk of the King's Works. It was during these years that Chaucer began working on his most famous text, The Canterbury Tales. The tales (mostly written in verse, although some are in prose) are presented as part of a story-telling contest by a group of pilgrims as they travel together from London to Canterbury to visit the shrine of Saint Thomas Becket at Canterbury Cathedral. The prize for this contest is a free meal at the Tabard Inn at Southwark on their return.

 The Knight’s Tale:

The noble Duke Theseus of Athens is on his way home from his invasion of Scythia, where he has won a wife, Hippolyta, and a sister-in-law, Emily. Sounds like a pretty successful trip, right? Along the way, Theseus & Co. meet a group of crying women. They beg Theseus to take vengeance on Creon, King of Thebes, because of his refusal to allow them to give their husbands' bodies a proper burial. Theseus agrees and beats Creon. In the process, he wins two noble Theban hostages, cousins Palamon and Arcite.

Theseus throws Palamon and Arcite in the slammer (a tower next to his garden), without ransom. One day in early May, Emily walks in the garden, gathering flowers. Palamon sees her from the prison window and immediately starts crushing on her. He's so smitten that he cries out. Hearing his cry, Arcite runs to his cousin. But as soon as he lays eyes on Emily, he falls for her too. The knights argue about who gets dibs on Emily. Arcite finally decides that it's a dumb argument to have; since both knights will be in prison forever, they'll just have to love Emily from afar with no hope of consummation.

Or maybe not. Soon, Arcite gets out of jail because he and Theseus have a mutual friend, who petitioned to get Arcite released. The only catch is that Arcite has to leave Athens and never set foot in the city again. Arcite moans and groans and feels sorry for himself, convinced that Palamon is better off than him because he gets to see Emily every day. Palamon, on the other hand, thinks that Arcite is a lucky dog because he can assemble an army to win Emily in battle.

Arcite returns to Thebes for a while, but, unable to stay away from Emily, quickly returns to Athens disguised as a servant. He works his way into Theseus's household, becoming Emily's manservant.

Meanwhile, Palamon has managed to escape from prison. He takes shelter in a grove of trees not far from the palace, planning to continue his journey under cover of nightfall. And – surprise, surprise – Arcite happens to go walking in that same grove. Palamon doesn't recognize him at first because of his disguise. When Arcite begins to speak of his love for Emily (because, you know, emo lovers always talk to themselves about their crushes), though, Palamon figures out who he is and leaps from the bushes, outraged. He and Arcite bicker. Arcite challenges Palamon to a duel, promising to return the next day with armor and weapons for Palamon, to ensure a fair fight.

The next day comes, and the two knights begin their duel. Duke Theseus and his party, out hawking, happen to come across the two knights as they battle. Theseus orders them to stop. When he finds out who they are at what they're fighting about, he at first wants to put them to death. But when the ladies, especially Hippolyta and Emily, beg for mercy, Theseus reconsiders. The Duke admits that he, too, has done some pretty stupid things for love.

Theseus decides that each of the knights must return in one year's time with one hundred knights, in order to fight an epic joust. The winner will get Emily. The knights agree, and ride home to Athens to gather knights. Meanwhile, Theseus pours time and money into building a huge stadium for the joust. It's like he's prepping for the World Cup. The stadium is complete with temples dedicated to Venus (goddess of love), Mars (god of war), and Diana (goddess of the hunt).

After a year has passed, Palamon and Arcite return to Athens, where everybody is ready to watch the competition and party. On the morning of the joust, the two knights and Emily visit the different temples. Palamon prays to Venus to grant him Emily, while Arcite asks Mars for victory in the joust. Emily, on the other hand, asks Diana to grant her perpetual virginity. (Guess she doesn't want to marry either of these guys.) Only Emily's request is refused. The knights' requests cause a conflict between Mars and Venus in the Heavens, but Jupiter (the king of the Gods) figures out a way to please both of them.

The joust begins, and many captives are taken. The fighting is fierce on both sides. In the end, Palamon is captured, and Arcite wins. On his victory ride, an earthquake in the stadium causes Arcite's horse to trip, sending him headfirst to the ground. Despite cracking his head pretty hard, everyone is sure that Arcite will recover. That night the people of Athens celebrate the upcoming marriage of Emily and Arcite.

But Arcite doesn't recover. He dies with Emily and Palamon at his bedside, using his last breath to tell Emily what a great guy Palamon is. Theseus arranges a fancy funeral for Arcite, after which Palamon returns to Thebes in mourning. He doesn't stay in Thebes very long, though. Theseus's counselors want an alliance between Athens and Thebes, and think that a marriage between Palamon and Emily would be just the thing. Theseus gives a long speech about how death is a part of God's plan for the world. At the end, he recommends that Palamon and Emily marry. They agree, and the story ends with a big, happy wedding.

 

Themes:

Rules and Order:

"The Knight's Tale" shows what happens when the rules of two different systems – chivalry and courtly love – come into conflict with one another. Palamon and Arcite have sworn a knightly oath to be loyal to one another, but they both fall in love with the same girl. The problem is, the rule of chivalry, which demands knights keep their oaths, is tested by the rule of courtly love, which demands that a knight put his love for his lady before everything else. This inevitably leads to a big, fat fight between the two knights. The tale solves the problem in the character of Duke Theseus, who proposes an organized contest to solve the feud. The winner gets Emily. Theseus is the order-bringer and rule-protector from the very beginning of "The Knight's Tale," when he sets its plot in motion by punishing a king who has broken the societal rule that bodies must receive a proper burial. Yet his desire for an orderly universe is tested when Arcite, the knight who wins the joust and Emily, dies in a freak accident immediately following the battle. To disprove the seeming randomness of this event, Theseus lays out a vision of an orderly universe with all creation deriving its existence from God. In this universe, death is a part of God's plan for creation, a sign that all is as it should be, so rules and order still prevail.

Love:

From the second Palamon and Arcite lay eyes on the lovely Emily, they are pierced to the heart by a love so intense that it literally makes them ill. Yeah, they seem like drama queens, but their behavior is pretty typical of the courtly love genre. Palamon and Arcite, two noble knights, spend most of their time pining for the love of a beautiful but distant noblewoman. The knights express their love in terms of wounds and sickness. Emily, the noblewoman, becomes almost a goddess. Palamon and Arcite swear to do anything to win the love of Emily, even if it includes breaking their knights' oaths to protect one another. But then Duke Theseus comes onto the scene and calls into question this kind of intense love and devotion. Theseus questions why anyone would want to serve the god of love if the only reward for this service is suffering. In the end, though, Theseus admits that he's done some pretty stupid things for the sake of love too. In fact, being lovesick and silly is something all people experience. The depictions of suffering for love that Theseus orders painted in the Temple of Venus prove his point, tying the suffering of Palamon, Arcite, and all lovers to a long and storied history of love.

 

Friendship:

Arcite and Palamon have sworn an oath of brotherhood to one another, promising to defend one another's interests in everything. Yet why might they break their promise? Because they love the same girl, that's why. Both Palamon and Arcite seem to think that romantic love is more important than bonds of friendship, and "The Knight's Tale" doesn't do much to question that point of view. In contrast to Palamon and Arcite's fair-weather friendship, however, a brief passage just after their falling-out details the devotion of Perotheus to Theseus. Apparently, these guys are such good friends that they're willing to go to Hell and back for one another. So, despite the main, unsuccessful friendship in the tale, we do get an inkling that other, deeper possibilities exist for the bond between two friends.

Death:

In "The Knight's Tale," death is closely connected to love on multiple levels. Like love, says Theseus, death is the great equalizer. It's an experience that every human – whether rich or poor, fat or thin, smart or silly – will someday endure. Like love, death makes the characters feel powerless over their fates. Like other stories that fall into the genre of courtly love, "The Knight's Tale" is in the habit of talking about love in terms of death.  Yes, Palamon and Arcite seem like drama queens when they complain that their love of Emily "slays" them, that they will "die" if separated from her.  But the placement of this metaphor next to very literal deaths brings out the similarities between these two kinds of death in an original way.

Suffering:

In "The Knight's Tale," suffering takes multiple forms, both physical and mental. Palamon and Arcite suffer a lot from their love for Emily. Their love afflicts them like an illness, or an arrow that pierces them through the eyes and stabs its way into their hearts. At various points, both men declare that they are suffering so much "wo" for love that they think they're going to die. It's not just our two heroes that suffer, though. Other, lesser characters suffer too. There's the lamenting women whose husbands' bodies Creon refuses to bury, not to mention all of the people of Athens, who scratch their faces and tear out their hair when they hear of Arcite's death. In most cases, characters in "The Knight's Tale" express their mental anguish physically, by comparing it to illness or physical wounds, or by actually wounding their bodies. In this way, "The Knight's Tale" points out that being messed up in the head or the heart can translate into actual physical pain. In the Temple of Mars, we also see how physical suffering can also be caused by war, so that love, loss, and violence become a triangle of suffering in the Tale.

Competition:

Palamon and Arcite are rivals for the love of the same woman.  The knights decide to fight a duel to determine who gets her. Yet when Duke Theseus stumbles upon the dueling knights, he declares their fight is unlawful.  The Duke proposes instead that there be a public joust, with a very clear set of rules, and the winner will marry Emily. Whereas the knight's duel upset the order of Theseus's kingdom, the joust becomes a part of it, showing the way in which violent competition can both disrupt and reinforce the rules of a society. Emily is the "prize" in this game whether she likes it or not, just as her sister, Hippolyta, was Theseus's prize after defeating the Amazons. In "The Knight's Tale," then, a man's job is to compete, while a women's role is to reward the winner.

Fate and Free Will:

All of the characters in "The Knight's Tale" believe that larger forces are at work behind everything that happens to them, deciding their destinies in love and life, and determining the time and circumstances of their deaths. Variously called "Fortune," or any one of the gods, this mysterious force writes people's fates in the stars. As Theseus reminds everyone in his  speech, it is pointless to rage against fate. Still, he's confident that the Fate has a plan, and that what may seem senseless is actually part of something larger than ourselves. All this talk about destiny and fate raises the question of how much responsibility an individual has for the course of his life. But the thing is, "The Knight's Tale" isn't really concerned with that question. Instead, it points to the fruitlessness of trying to shape one's own destiny. The proper way to live your life is simply to accept your fate with patience and to try to make the best of it.

Strength and Skill

Palamon and Arcite have to decide who gets Emily in armed combat, which means that the better fighter gets the girl. Or does it? See, Palamon and Arcite are both equally strong knights who are able to marshal equally strong armies when necessary. This means that in addition to strength and skill, luck (a.k.a. having the gods on your side) is necessary in order to win. The knight's job is to bring his talents to the table and hope that the gods will do the rest. This isn't to say that strength and skill are totally without use in "The Knight's Tale." Theseus demonstrates how might can be used to make right when he goes to battle with Creon to avenge the mourning women. And as the tale pauses to describe the battle-array and sheer spectacle of Team Palamon versus Team Arcite, we can't help but be kind of impressed by it all.

THE REFORM BILLS

 Introduction:

The most outstanding change that took place in the nineteenth century was the gradual emergence of England as a democracy. This change was brought about by a series of Reform Bills. With the passing of each bill, a larger section of the population was given the right to vote. By the time the last bill was passed in 1928, every adult male and female could vote.

First Reform Bill:

There had been no major change in the representative system of England and Wales since Tudor times. Each borough and county could send two representatives to the Parliament. After the Agrarian and Industrial Revolutions, most of the people living in boroughs migrated to the cities. Some boroughs even disappeared completely.  Yet they enjoyed the benefits of sending two representatives to the Parliament. Ironically, big industrial towns did not have any representation. The workers resented this as they had no scope for expressing their grievances to the government. Another factor which led to the passing of the Reform Bill of 1832 was the unjust qualification for a person to have the right to vote. According to the old custom, any freeholder with an income of forty shillings could vote while wealthy tenant farmers could not.

This caused a lot of discontent in the minds of the people. The Whig government appointed a committee to study parliamentary reform. Lord Durham, the chairman of this committee, made a thorough study of the existing state of affairs and submitted his report. Earl Grey, the Prime Minister, accepted the changes recommended by the Durham Committee and introduced the Reform Bill in Parliament in 1831. The House of Lords opposed the bill, and as a result, Grey requested King William IV to dissolve the Parliament. In the general election which followed the dismissal of the government, the Whigs were reelected. This clearly indicated that the people wanted reform very badly. The Reform Bill was once again rejected in the House of Lords. Earl Grey resigned and Wellington was asked to form the ministry. Wellington could not do so and Grey was asked to return. When the bill was proposed for the third time in 1832, it was finally passed. The total number of seats in the House of Commons remained unaltered. Fifty-six ‘rotten boroughs’ were disfranchised and thirty others could send only one member.

As a result, a hundred and forty-three seats were released. Of these sixty-five were given to large towns and cities that had been unrepresented so far. Sixty-five others were given to newly-created constituencies that were thickly populated. The remaining thirteen were given to Ireland and Scotland. As far as the question of franchise was concerned, the forty-shilling freeholders retained the right to vote, but the franchise was extended to copyholders and leaseholders whose lands were worth $100 a year. Short lease holders and tenants whose lands were worth $50 a year were also given the right to vote.

Effects of First Reform Bill and the Introduction of Second Reform Bill:

These changes, although they might appear impressive at first glance were not all that revolutionary. The people expected a great deal from the Reform Bill, but in reality, only one section of society benefited – the middle class. It nevertheless broke the monopoly of power possessed by the gentry and the nobility. By giving the vote to the middle class, the centre of gravity in politics was shifted. A major result of the Reform Bill in 1832 was that it had set the ball rolling. Once one section of society got the franchise, the other sections were bound to make demands too. The working classes, who did not benefit through the Reform Bill, remained disgruntled. This led to several agitations and movements. Of these, the most important were socialism, trade unionism and Chartism. Chartism was an uprising demanding reform. It was a movement started by William Lovett in 1836. It was fervent and tempestuous protest by the poor against the sordid conditions under which they lived. Demand for the franchise was made for the working class. Lovett, with the help of Francis Place, drew up a programme outlining the reform of Parliament. This programme, which had six points was known as the People’s Charter. It was from this that the movement got the name of Chartism. The Chartists’ demands were rejected by the Parliament in 1839 and in 1842. A general strike was declared and hundreds of Chartists were imprisoned. Although the movement appeared a failure, ultimately, most of their demands were conceded. The Second Reform Bill was introduced by Gladstone in 1866 and was rejected in the House of Commons itself. Later, there was a wave of resentment among the working classes and the lower middle classes. They demanded reform and held demonstrations at Hyde Park. Lord Derby, who was the Prime Minister then, passed the Second Reform Bill in 1867 with the support of Disraeli. This gave the vote to artisans and small householders. By the Reform Bill of 1867, all workmen who lived in towns got the franchise. After 1867, one out of twelve people had the right to vote. However, agricultural labourers and miners were excluded.

The Third Reform Bill:

The Third Reform Bill was passed by Gladstone when he was Prime Minister. It was rejected by the House of Lords and was finally passed only after a series of conferences between Gladstone and Salisbury. Through this bill, all householders in the counties were given the right to vote. By this move, about two million new voters were created in England. It also increased the electorate in Ireland and thus gave it a greater representation in Parliament. The most important effect of the third act was that it did away with the old practice of representation by counties and boroughs. The country was divided into single-member constituencies of equal population. Every man who lived in a permanent house, either as a landlord or as a tenant, had the right to vote. This act made England a democracy and dealt a severe blow to the power of the aristocracy. The power now passed over completely to the people. The Representation of the People Act of 1918 gave the vote to all men above the age of twenty-one and to all women over thirty. For the first time, women were given franchise. This age difference was abolished in 1928 and since then both men and women were considered equals as far as the electorate was concerned.

Conclusion:

A study of these Reform Bills unfolds before us the gradual emergence of England from the clutches of the King and the nobles. Step by step, the various sections of society were given the franchise until every adult male and female had a role to play in choosing the government. Today, England, is one of the leading democratic countries of the world and serves as an example to the rest.

 

 

Far from the Madding Crowd (Thomas Hardy)

  About the Author:  Thomas Hardy  (2 June 1840 – 11 January 1928) was an English novelist and poet. A Victorian realist in the tradition of...