About the Author
T.W. Robertson (1829-1871) was an English
dramatist and stage director known for his development of naturalism in British
theatre. Born to a theatrical family, Robertson began as an actor, but he was
not a success and gave up acting in his late 20s. After earning a modest living
writing articles for the press, he wrote plays and achieved success in 1865.
His plays include, “Society”, “Caste”. According to critics his plays are known
for ‘cup-and-saucer’ realism. Unlike the oversized acting in Victorian melodrama,
his plays are known for realism.
Characters:
1.
Sir
Charles Cannon – An aristocrat who represents the authority, privilege, and
exclusiveness of Victorian high society.
2.
Lady
Blanche Hoyden – His daughter
3.
John
Chodd, Jr. – A wealthy but vulgar social climber
4.
John
Chodd, Sr. – His father, also eager for social advancement
5.
Lord
Beaufoy – A witty nobleman, more relaxed than Sir Charles
6.
Squire
Haymarket – A country gentleman
7.
Mawson
– A sycophantic hanger-on,
8.
Tom
Stylus – A character representing Bohemian/artistic life outside of
aristocratic circles
Introduction
Thomas William Robertson’s “Society”
(1865) is one of the landmark plays of the Victorian stage. Performed at the
Prince of Wales’s Theatre under the management of Squire and Marie Wilton, it
marked the rise of Robertson as the pioneer of “cup-and-saucer drama”—a term
used to describe his focus on everyday domestic realism in contrast to the
melodrama and spectacle that dominated earlier Victorian theatre.
Plot and Structure
The play centers on the world of Victorian
high society, with its pretensions, hypocrisies, and rigid class distinctions.
The characters navigate love, marriage, ambition, and social climbing. At its
heart, the play questions whether money and birth should determine one’s place
in society, or whether personal worth and sincerity matter more.
Robertson observes the classical unities
of time and place more closely than his predecessors, keeping the action
domestic and believable. The scenes are drawn from ordinary life, with
tea-drinking, drawing-room conversation, and casual social interactions
replacing sensational stage effects.
Themes
Class and Social Barriers – The play
critiques the exclusiveness of the aristocracy and exposes the snobbery of
those who guard “Society” against outsiders.
Money vs. Birth – Robertson
raises the question of whether inherited status is superior to self-made
wealth.
Marriage and Love – Marriage is
portrayed as a conflict between social expectation and genuine affection.
Satire of Hypocrisy – Aristocrats are
shown as pretentious and shallow, more concerned with appearances than with
moral or personal worth.
Realism in Theatre – Robertson’s
biggest contribution lies in naturalistic dialogue, modern dress, and realistic
sets, which gave audiences a sense of recognition and relatability.
Style and Innovation
Unlike earlier Victorian melodramas filled
with exaggerated emotions, improbable plots, and moral absolutes, Robertson’s “Society”
is restrained, conversational, and believable. His dialogue sounds like real
conversation, often punctuated with wit and irony. The play is often called a
turning point in English drama, laying the groundwork for later playwrights
like Arthur Wing Pinero, Henry Arthur Jones, and eventually George Bernard
Shaw, who further developed realism and the drama of ideas.
Critical Significance
When “Society” premiered, critics
hailed it as a refreshing departure from artificial melodrama. It appealed to
middle-class audiences who wanted to see their own world represented on stage.
Robertson thus bridged the gap between popular theatre and literary drama.
Conclusion
T. W. Robertson’s “Society” stands
as a pioneering work in Victorian drama. With its focus on social class,
realistic domestic settings, and critique of aristocratic hypocrisy, the play
not only entertained but also reflected the values and aspirations of its age.
As the foundation of the “cup-and-saucer” tradition, it transformed English
theatre and paved the way for realism, ensuring Robertson’s place in the
history of modern drama.
No comments:
Post a Comment